Debunking Popular Myths About Rural Hospital Closures

In recent years, hospital closures have skyrocketed in rural communities, leaving gaps in care throughout the country, but Americans have a lot of misconceptions about why these closures occur and who they affect. First, many people blame closures on poor management; in reality fewer patients and high fixed costs disproportionately affect rural hospitals, forcing closures regardless of management. People also believe telehealth is a suitable replacement for full-service hospitals, but it can’t replace the lifesaving care a physical hospital can provide. There’s a common misconception that rural hospital closures only affect rural communities. In reality, nearby hospitals are forced to absorb the overflow, leading to higher costs and longer wait times that impact people well beyond the affected area. Some say that converting to out-patient only facilities will lower costs while preserving care, but that passes the burden of inpatient care onto other hospitals and increases health risk when patients have to be transferred for long-term recovery. Finaly, many people think merging with larger healthcare systems will save rural hospitals. However, these mergers have mixed outcomes with cost-cutting and consolidation being common fates for these hospitals. Our Health Equity advocates for accessible and affordable healthcare for all Americans, no matter where they live. Read more here.